Marx's Theory of Revolutions

Marx's Theory of Revolutions

Thursday, September 28, 2017

September 28-October 3 – September 15-September 20, 1917: Resolutions of the Conference


The Democratic Conference debates several alternatives to Kerensky’s Directory over the next few days.

The Compromisers had drawn back from earlier statements, of the kind that inspired an offer of a deal from Lenin, that the Cadets might be excluded from a new formulation of the Coalition Government. At the conference, Trotsky argued against their inclusion because, as a party, they had not unambiguously denounced the Kornilov insurrection while it was taking place. The response was that, if it was a mistake to blame the whole Bolshevik party for the actions of a few during the July Days, it was also a mistake to blame the whole Cadet party for the actions of those members who abetted Kornilov. Trotsky answered by making a distinction: it is not a question of inviting individual Cadets “into the jails,” but of inviting the party as a whole “into the ministry.” The conference should do the former, but because the bourgeois press either “openly welcomed” Kornilov or “kept mum,” it should not do the latter.

A sailor from the Baltic Fleet spoke even more directly to this point, saying, “Against the creation of a Coalition Ministry the sailors have raised their battle flag!”

Trotsky expresses the alternatives before the conference this way: the centrists wanted a coalition, but without the Cadets; delegates on the right favored Kerensky and wanted to bring the Cadets into the government; the left, including the Bolsheviks, called for a government of the soviets, or at any rate a ministry of socialists – to the exclusion of the Cadets. These positions, of which that of the centrists was the most unstable, governed the formulation of the resolutions placed before the conference.

A centrist resolution in favor of a coalition passed, 766 to 688, but then a left amendment for excluding the Cadets also passed, 595 to 493. When the question was on the resolution as amended, the right and left joined in voting against it with 813 votes, leaving only 133 centrist votes in favor.

The organizers of the conference were at a loss. They convened a rump committee of party leaders, but their vote was also disappointing: 50 for coalition, 60 against. The committee was able to agree, unanimously, that whatever government should happen to be formed, should be responsible to the Democratic Conference. It then resolved that the conference should become a permanent body. Finally it voted to add members of the bourgeois parties to that body, 56 to 48.

Then Kerensky turned up again and told the conference he would not take part in a government of only one party or group of parties. Note that this involves admitting that he would not be able to sustain his Directory if the conference should prefer a new coalition.

No comments:

Post a Comment